RAP4 P99 vs. Kingman Eraser
Lets start off with what a simple Google search will produce:
Construction: all metal
Max velocity: 250 fps
Weight: 2.5 lbs
Gun include: one magazine, two co2 cartiges, 100 paintballs, squeegee and barrel plug
Construction: metal and plastic
Max velocity: 300 fps
Weight: 2 lbs
Gun includes: one magazine, cleaning kit and carrying case
The rest of their specs are the same or really similar.
Both are mag fed with a 9 ball capacity.
Both use a 12g co2 cartrige thats screwed into the grip.
Both have a working slide to chamber a ball. (only the walther has blow-back action)
Ok, so now that we have that out of the way. My use of a .43 sidearm will be on the paintball feild as a secondary. I'm using a tank in stock 7oz co2, with either a 44 or 56 round tac cap, so my secondary will come into play often. I have watched/read several reviews on both and they both have attractive features. One of the biggest pro to con that I have seen in comparison between them is the Eraser seems to be very accurate in most tests I have seen, such as hitting h2o bottles from 60ft. Where the P99 seems
to be less accurate at even 20ft. This may just be an oversight but it is one of my two cheif concerns. The other is the Eraser only shoots a tad over 250fps but the P99 can shoot 300fps. This translates to more range and balls breaking better, but none of that matters if your gun is far less accurate. One thing I can say I've read is for the most part even with the Eraser shooting a lower fps most people say balls break fine with the right paint. Another thing I kept seeing come up was the RAP4 guns chopping/breaking paint in the gun.
In this comparison it's a plus if you have had or do own one/both gun/s, but at least have a decent amount of time using at least one before you comment. Please don't be THAT guy that comments and says ones the best ever just because he owns it or has shot it, once, and not even different paint.