 |
02-14-2013, 12:06 PM
|
#1
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: cincinnati
|
Freak Boring..Worth it?
So I as thinking of getting a barrel bored out to accept freaks but just wondering if it would be worth the trouble to get it done.
|
|
|
02-14-2013, 02:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
http://goo.gl/W9DoA
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 949 SoCal
|
Depends. Boring will cost ~$45 shipping both ways. Freak kit ~$70. If not the kit, at least $30 worth of inserts to justify boring it out in the first place.
Is bore match super important to you? or are you getting roll outs?
What gun are you shooting?
|
|
|
02-15-2013, 06:54 AM
|
#3
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
|
That is a question I have been asking others that do barrel testing to see if the TechT iFit 1.75" control bores are a better solution to boring out an existing barrel to use Freak inserts.
The TechT ones can be used on any existing barrels without mods. Unfortunately I can not find any testing comparisons for these short control bore system comparing it to a Freak.
|
|
|
02-15-2013, 11:15 AM
|
#4
|
|
http://goo.gl/W9DoA
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 949 SoCal
|
This is a discussion relevant to control bore length. somewhere in that mess people are claiming ~7" is ideal. I believe it probably has to do with efficiency as well as accuracy. A short control bore may be just as accurate, but it would require a larger volume of air to get the ball up to the same fps. Too long of a control and you're adding friction.
http://www.pbnation.com/showthread.p...+bore+le ngth
|
|
|
02-15-2013, 05:00 PM
|
#5
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
|
Somewhere, TechT claimed that a paintball reaches its max acceleration with only 1.75" of control bore, thus their design.
Last edited by SilentBall55 : 02-15-2013 at 07:38 PM.
|
|
|
02-15-2013, 05:54 PM
|
#6
|
|
http://goo.gl/W9DoA
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 949 SoCal
|
I've heard that too.
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 02:34 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentBall55
Somewhere, TechT claimed that a paintball reaches its max acceleration with only 1.75" of control bore, thus their design.
|
They made a video showing best results from the ifit used with the freak, not instead of. The ifit and freak together get the control bore to around 7".
The ifit/python just isn't long enough on its own. I used one by itself for awhile, but never got the performance my freak kit offered. I'd use it on a pump cocker to prevent roll outs (if I didn't have a freak) or if my marker didn't accept a larger OD barrel, like the spyder mr3.
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 08:58 AM
|
#8
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
|
I have several barrel kits that use Freak inserts. Also replacement Freak inserts are so easy to get and it has served me well, I will stick with it.
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 11:23 PM
|
#9
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beaver Falls PA
|
It really not a lot of trouble you can see my prices in my service thread but since your in OH and I am near Pittsburgh PA I bet if you ship the barrel to me next Monday you will have it back by Friday
|
|
|
02-20-2013, 05:47 AM
|
#10
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentBall55
Somewhere, TechT claimed that a paintball reaches its max acceleration with only 1.75" of control bore, thus their design.
|
They later retracted that statement after getting called out.
The optimal bore length is generally considered to be somewhere between 7-10 inches of length. It can vary with guns depending on the valve type being used. Punkworks has a project under way to try and narrow down the ideal length for the various paintball marker types.
|
|
|
03-21-2013, 07:55 AM
|
#11
|
|
|
So the information Techt put out about the ability of their Ifit product was incorrect? Is there any video on this?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|