[tim2thousand4]

Originally Posted by tim2thousand4

I'm entitled to my own opinion prick!

ok. I'm done.

[martix_agent]

well that was weird

[Punks_Not_Dead77]

Originally Posted by martix_agent

well that was weird

I think there's more than one "voice" in his head..

[DVC_Hicks]

almost as weird as asking for a 50 cal Impulse... I mean who does that sort of thing?

[martix_agent]

Originally Posted by DVC_Hicks

almost as weird as asking for a 50 cal Impulse... I mean who does that sort of thing?

but seriously. I know they made them, but none pop up in our b/s/t

[Punks_Not_Dead77]

Originally Posted by DVC_Hicks

almost as weird as asking for a 50 cal Impulse... I mean who does that sort of thing?

Has that .50 cal **** caught on at all?

[martix_agent]

Originally Posted by Punks_Not_Dead77

Has that .50 cal **** caught on at all?

not even a little bit. But they're not bad for scenario play because you can hold a TON of balls onto the field.

[Punks_Not_Dead77]

Originally Posted by martix_agent

not even a little bit. But they're not bad for scenario play because you can hold a TON of balls onto the field.

I can see it's potential in the scenario scene. Not going to lie, just saw DYE's scenario matrix, looks pretty sweet. Don't think I could drop $1300 on something like that though.

[tim2thousand4]

The dam is the only tactical marker to buy IMO.

I think its ****ing sweet. Mine shot amazing!

[blueshifty]

Originally Posted by tim2thousand4

Oh shutup, it's just your opinion.

Lol. Tim Durden.

[Pbkid's pmr]

Originally Posted by tim2thousand4

The dam is the only tactical marker to buy IMO.

I think its ****ing sweet. Mine shot amazing!

I'd rock an modded up tippmann a5 just a mechanical feeling to them.

[lopez17]

Originally Posted by martix_agent

not even a little bit. But they're not bad for scenario play because you can hold a TON of balls onto the field.

You also need to shoot all that paint to get one to break.

[Dagger8805]

I'd rather rock a pump.

[SKI008]

Originally Posted by martix_agent

in a b/s/t sort of way, where could i find a 50 cal impulse? are they kinda hard to find? do they even make 50 cal paintballs anymore?
Maybe i can get a 50 cal g6r conversion?

BST is your best bet but I don't think they made all that many of them. They do make 50 cal paintballs iirc but 50 cal is **** and you don't want it.

[martix_agent]

Originally Posted by SKI008

BST is your best bet but I don't think they made all that many of them. They do make 50 cal paintballs iirc but 50 cal is **** and you don't want it.

It was a wild idea i had just recently. I forgot about them not breaking on people.

[blueshifty]

I don't understand... Stock engine marq set at 80 lpr 220 hpr and a SC'd marq set to 75 lpr 180 hpr and the stock engine is smoother and quieter. Doesn't make logical sense.

[martix_agent]

That's the sacrifice you make to get more shots per fill.
It's like magic.

[blueshifty]

Originally Posted by martix_agent

That's the sacrifice you make to get more shots per fill.
It's like magic.

But the pressure numbers are what make that happen. The SC engine runs at significantly lower numbers.

I am starting to think the stock engine wastes a lot of air per cycle... it's like the valve open to valve close events (mechanical dwell) are way off. Adding spring tension and mass to the bolt would probably help or any other way of getting the valve shut sooner. The only other thing that isn't adding up is why the dwell tuning is the same.

Lurker... come weigh in.

[tim2thousand4]

Originally Posted by blueshifty

I don't understand... Stock engine marq set at 80 lpr 220 hpr and a SC'd marq set to 75 lpr 180 hpr and the stock engine is smoother and quieter. Doesn't make logical sense.

BAHAHAHAHHHAHAHA

I MOTHER****INGTOLDYOU!

[tim2thousand4]

The answer is in volume. That's why the stock engine burns so much more smoothly and less efficiently. I love a stock engine!

[blueshifty]

Originally Posted by tim2thousand4

BAHAHAHAHHHAHAHA

I MOTHER****INGTOLDYOU!

I never disagreed, but it makes no sense. I am going to be needing a few extra ram shafts (or whatever the piece that connects to the bolt is) for some experimentation with the lurker idea of turning them down to introduce back pressure to close the valve faster. It is kinda crazy.

Originally Posted by tim2thousand4

The answer is in volume. That's why the stock engine burns so much more smoothly and less efficiently. I love a stock engine!

Would make sense if the stock engine ran at LOWER pressure than the SC, but it doesn't. It is dumping air that isn't needed to get the ball to velocity.