[Murph1329]

[Murph1329]

[Iamamartianchurch]

Funny but not worth talking about.

[quakcer]

Originally Posted by Iamamartianchurch

Funny but not worth talking about.

Yes it is, because it's bribery.

[FreeEnterprise]

It is the exact same tactic they are using with the "tax the rich"... Making poor people think they will take money from the rich and give it to them...

Paying for votes. Just like they are paying $11 an hour for "protesters" at Romney events.

[justicexd]

Originally Posted by Murph1329

Yup, that pretty much describes the intelligence of a typical Obama supporter on PBN.

[FreeEnterprise]

Focused like a LASER on.... Re-election?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...=all#pagebreak

[Swerve22]

Lady sounds like Mr. T's mom.

lol @ paying people 11 bucks an hour to protest Romney.

[Treghc]

Originally Posted by quakcer

Yes it is, because it's bribery.

Except low income low income households have been eligible for discounted or even free phones for well over a decade. It's also not funded by the government, but rather by telephone companies making payments to a fund administered by a non-profit called the Universal Service Administrative Company.

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/polit...e-video/57353/

So, no... it's not worth talking about.

[Murph1329]

Originally Posted by Treghc

Except low income low income households have been eligible for discounted or even free phones for well over a decade. It's also not funded by the government, but rather by telephone companies making payments to a fund administered by a non-profit called the Universal Service Administrative Company.

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/polit...e-video/57353/

So, no... it's not worth talking about.

LOL fact check fails again. Fact check does a great job of deceiving people on their answers.

What you're looking for is the Universal Service Fund which was created by the FCC. They have forced providers to pay a "fee" into this to provide low income families with land line and cell phones. The "fee" is then passed on to the end consumer, you and I, as a "fee." The question on fact check was is it a tax? Well i guess not since it's a "fee" passed on to you and I when we get our bill. Symantics I guess

Also the fact check response of, "they have been offering this for over a decade." Well that's true if you look at land line but it's not true if you look at cell service. Cell phones started in 2008 which is a lot less than 10 years. Once again fact check pushing an agenda.


All these damn liberals that believe websites like this without doing their own research really get under my skin.

[shakeyjonez]

2008? You mean people started getting free cell phones during an election year? What a coincidence.

[FreeEnterprise]

it is what liberals do... they lie and manipulate.

Fact checks are often just liberal democratic talking points.

Just like much of the polling out right now, asks 9+ MORE democrats than republicans, and then says. "hey lookie, Obama is ahead because we asked more democrats than republicans in the polls....".


Liberals have weaponized "fact check" and "polling" in this election with the goal of getting Obama re-elected in the worst economic times of our lifetimes...

[Treghc]

Originally Posted by Murph1329

LOL fact check fails again. Fact check does a great job of deceiving people on their answers.

What you're looking for is the Universal Service Fund which was created by the FCC. They have forced providers to pay a "fee" into this to provide low income families with land line and cell phones. The "fee" is then passed on to the end consumer, you and I, as a "fee." The question on fact check was is it a tax? Well i guess not since it's a "fee" passed on to you and I when we get our bill. Symantics I guess

Also the fact check response of, "they have been offering this for over a decade." Well that's true if you look at land line but it's not true if you look at cell service. Cell phones started in 2008 which is a lot less than 10 years. Once again fact check pushing an agenda.


All these damn liberals that believe websites like this without doing their own research really get under my skin.

So... what you're telling me... is that Obama didn't enact this? Okay. Thanks.

[Overbear]

You know, the more I see things like this, the more I am not suprised why there are racial "gaps" in education and job pay.

[drgonzo]

I have a corporation-subsidized phone. It's a great arrangement, the corporation pays for a huge chunk of the phone and over time I pay them more back in usage fees.

Originally Posted by Murph1329

Also the fact check response of, "they have been offering this for over a decade." Well that's true if you look at land line but it's not true if you look at cell service. Cell phones started in 2008 which is a lot less than 10 years. Once again fact check pushing an agenda.

What agenda do you think that would be? Who was in office in 2008? Whose FCC is responsible?

Originally Posted by shakeyjonez

2008? You mean people started getting free cell phones during an election year? What a coincidence.

Interesting that the party that brought it to the world lost.

[shakeyjonez]

What's even more interesting was that it was rigged. Got Acorn?

[Tuff]

This thread sucks because that woman in Murph's post sucks and I'm sick of looking at her face. People like her need to move to Canada in droves.