Originally Posted by ATLpaintballa
word, the graphics seem less textured and not as in depth. But they seem to have fixed knifing a little more
graphics are GARBO! compared to Medal of honor. When i played the new MOH and got sooo hyped for Cod considering they had pretty much established themselves as thee game for FPS. But after playing multiplayer, zombies and beating the campaign, it doesnt seem so.
The campaign was so so (compared to the new medal of honor and more importantly previous COD games)
the graphics arent anything to be bragged about
And the spawning is ridiculous!
Perks seem to be hit or miss as is the design of the multi player maps.
two words... drop shot.
The customization and new betting games introduced is cool but at the expense of what was listed above... hard to say.
Zombies was an epic addition though.
in conclusion. if we could take the engine from medal of honor and put it in COD then it would have been a clean success.
also - something that i noticed. weapons sounds, explosion sounds have been way better in battlefield and in MOH.
*The game is good but slightly disappointing