[Crane]

GooG... Theres not really an "in between" price range for tele zooms. they are either cheap ($200 and crappy) or $800+ (crisp and amazing)

[GooG]

Originally Posted by Crane

GooG... Theres not really an "in between" price range for tele zooms. they are either cheap ($200 and crappy) or $800+ (crisp and amazing)

yea, whats the difference in the abbreviations like VR and i think it was apo or something?

[Crane]

this is the closest to mid range you will find

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation

its a good wide angle and you get a partial tele zoom. you wont get as close.. but this is a better quality lens...

VR= Vibration reduction

APO= sigmas crappy name.

they have no relation

[robfromabove]

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation

50-150mm f/2.8, only 679.00 (slightly more affordable)

[Topazbullet]

You get what you pay for... I'm saving up for a 70-200 VR, and I've been using a 50mm 1.8 for now. I recommend you do the same.

[Crane]

Originally Posted by Topazbullet

You get what you pay for... I'm saving up for a 70-200 VR, and I've been using a 50mm 1.8 for now. I recommend you do the same.

Id personally go for the 80-200 w/o VR.. half the price homie. and it prodices the same pics... I never use the VR with mine.

[Topazbullet]

Originally Posted by Crane

Id personally go for the 80-200 w/o VR.. half the price homie. and it prodices the same pics... I never use the VR with mine.

My body's motor is relatively weak though, so I want the AFS