[katsung47]

762. Target on New York (3/9/2013)

The main target city of a "terror attack" is New York.

Bin Laden son-in-law arrested, whisked to NYC on terror charges

Officials tell NBC News he had been a prisoner in Iran for most of the past decade and is scheduled to appear in federal court Friday. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

By Jonathan Dienst, Pete Williams and Andrea Mitchell, NBC News

Osama bin Laden's son-in-law, who acted as a spokesman for al-Qaida, has been apprehended, transported to New York and charged with conspiracy to kill Americans, according to court documents unsealed Thursday.

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2...r-charges?lite

Al Qaida is a secret asset of US. It works for US strategy interest. Bin Laden worked as a living plant. The country where he went, was claimed “evil axis” by US. Under such excuse, Bush activated war in Mid-east. Abu Ghaith- Bin Laden’s son in law – has the same mission. He was arranged to smuggle to Iran in 2002 at the purpose to frame Iran a “terrorist” country. Iran might have known the trick and put Bin Laden’s “refugee relatives” into prison.

Now when the Feds planed another “terror attack” on US, they need a complete story – a big head of terrorist is on trial in New York. Al Qaida revenges the trial with a nuke attack. Since the frame case was original projected in March – we saw just in days, Abu Ghaith was arrested and sent to New York. What a rush.
New York has been the target in Feds’ blacklist for a long time under the same project. The terror attack was designed to trigger war on Iran that would be used to distract a framed case. An identical one was the attempt to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in New York. From the news you could see the master mind was the D.O.J. Chief Eric Holder.

Accused 9/11 Mastermind to Face Civilian Trial in N.Y.

By CHARLIE SAVAGE November 13, 2009

The decision, announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., could mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set just blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 2,750 people.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us...anted=all&_r=0

The Trial

Eric Holder and the battle over Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

by Jane Mayer February 15, 2010

On December 5th, several hundred people gathered in Foley Square, in lower Manhattan, and withstood a drenching rainstorm for two hours in order to send a message to Attorney General Eric Holder. A JumboTron, set up by the protesters, played clips of Holder’s recent testimony before Congress, in which he explained his decision to hold the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed—the self-proclaimed planner of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001—and four co-conspirators in the colonnaded federal courthouse flanking the square, rather than in a military commission at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Members of the crowd shouted at the

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...#ixzz2N4yqhX1F

New Yorkers might have been aware of the plot planted on them. They fiercely opposed it and successfully rejected that trial. Eric Holder knows it. He still puts another one on them in a raid.

[F1VENOM]

I wish you'd seek professional help.

[katsung47]

763. Why select New York? (3/18/2013)

Several years after 911 attack, people were rattled by unusual cancer case among first responders of ground zero. They started to think the WTC were pulled down by mini nukes.

"35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
Thursday, July 02, 2009

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
.....

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html"

"China Syndrome at the WTC

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/chinasyn.html"

Then cancer caused death rapidly rose. 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

"9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale”

April 4, 2011 By Daily Mail Reporter

A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises’ in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.

Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has reportedly said that cancer cases across ‘all ranks’ of the FDNY who worked at Ground Zero are ‘up significantly’.

It is thought that the report – due to be officially disclosed in time for the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in September – cites unusual rises in leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.

‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.’

The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/911-nuke-demolition-proof-firefighters-radiation-cancers-off-the-scale/"

Now you should understand why Eric Holder announced to put "911 mastermind K.S.Mohammed " on trial in New York" in 2009. It was used to justify an "Al Qaida revenge attack for trial of their leader". The planned attack was a nuclear one, so they could blame the cancer were caused by Al Qaida terror attack. The purpose is to cover up the truth that in 911 attack, mini nukes were used. The similar tactic has been tried in 2007, when a B-52 flied over US continental with 6 loaded nuke missiles. New York must have been the target of these nuclear missiles. Of course, mainstream media beat the drum on “911 Master-mind trial” but rarely report the unusual cancer deaths of the first responders of ground zero. Because that would expose who was the real Master-mind of 911 – Al Qaida has no nuclear bomb.

[In Da Snake11]

http://www.ae911truth.org/

The presence of thermite amongst the debris, as well as molten metal pouring out the sides of the buildings are both very suspicious. While I'm not making any conclusions as to who was behind the attacks, it is apparent that far more went into the collapse of these towers than the planes hitting them.

This is why I'm worried about the FBI taking over investigations into the recent events in Boston. They obviously either botched horribly the 9/11 investigations, showing incompetence, or purposely hid information. Either way, I'd much rather see investigations in the hands of Boston Police, not federal agents.

[rT159]

Originally Posted by In Da Snake11

http://www.ae911truth.org/

The presence of thermite amongst the debris, as well as molten metal pouring out the sides of the buildings are both very suspicious. While I'm not making any conclusions as to who was behind the attacks, it is apparent that far more went into the collapse of these towers than the planes hitting them.

This is why I'm worried about the FBI taking over investigations into the recent events in Boston. They obviously either botched horribly the 9/11 investigations, showing incompetence, or purposely hid information. Either way, I'd much rather see investigations in the hands of Boston Police, not federal agents.

Kinda how LAPD when they were tracking down homeboy and shooting at unarmed old ladies in a suspicious vehicle that wasn't even close to what the perp was driving? Yes, by all means, let the police handle the investigation.

[katsung47]

761. “Less safe” may be a nuke attack (3/4/2013)

To start a war, they need justification. For war on Iraq, Afghanistan, they activated 911 attack. For war on Iran, they still need a 911 alike “terror attack”. Eric Holder’s claim on 3/1 may signal this:

Eric Holder on decision day: the country will be less safe
By Pierre Thomas, Richard Coolidge, and Jordyn Phelps 3/1/2013

Attorney General Eric Holder says the country is less safe because of the across-the-board spending cuts that go into effect today and that those who claim the administration has been fear mongering about the cuts simply don't have the facts straight.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-pl...123204219.html

Take the chance of Sequestration, they make a “terror attack” reasonable. That “less safe” case likely would be a nuke attack. The following news issued three months ago, though could be misinformation, may have revealed what kind of “less safe” case would be.

Nuclear Christmas, false flag in America to blame on Iran
There are strong confirmations that one or more nuclear weapons, known to have been stolen but kept from the public to “prevent panic,” may well be deployed in American cities by extremist elements with probable ties to a foreign intelligence agency.

This scenario was the basis of the television show “Jericho” several years ago. However, this time there are real culprits and real motivations, both the overthrow of the government of the United States and the naming of Iran as a “scapegoat.”

The plot has been tracked to groups within the Pentagon, several government agencies and wealthy and powerful extremist backers of Netanyahu and, in particular, the “Gulf Cartel” operating from Mexico that has penetrated nearly all levels of government, law enforcement and the military across the country.

Using surprisingly direct language, President Obama has officially confirmed this conspiracy.
…….

Thus, when a threat of an attack on the “government and nation” is revealed, two things become obvious:

1. Only a nuclear attack, likely more than one location, could push America to the new war Israel wants and bully the American people into even more “police state” legislation and the total abandonment of what is left of democratic government.

2. News and entertainment have been systematically pre-staging such a move through highly fictionalized and propagandized “brainwashing” that is intended to make Iran the scapegoat for what President Obama has now revealed is actually an “insider threat” within the American government.

Nukes, Lost, Stolen and “Misplaced” Now “in Play”
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/11...se-flag-in-us/