Who should we attack next?

oreo · 08-03-2004, 04:31 PM

so when we fianialy do withdraw from iraq who do you think we will be attacking or getting attacked by next?

*you have to be at least 15 with some type of civics or social studies class, and have a brain* and no Bush is gay posts i dont care he is better the kerry.

Sacintimidator06 · 08-03-2004, 04:34 PM

Well if Bush is president again(god save us from him) then I say Iran. Oil+greedy Bush+ Arabic people= reasonable cause for Bush.

KlassicCrayola · 08-03-2004, 04:40 PM

I would have to say, depending on who is president, either Iran or North Korea.

Parkert1234 · 08-03-2004, 04:42 PM

Well if Bush is in office.....Anyone that thinks differently than him.

Ivan the Terrible · 08-03-2004, 04:43 PM

I hope China invades us. That'd be fun.

kwheezy2000 · 08-03-2004, 04:49 PM

We won't get invaded, trust me

I don't think Iran, North Korea is where it's at

oreo · 08-03-2004, 04:54 PM

if they invade they better no envade the east coast... they wont get past ohio... and they army wont evan have to be deployed

Deceit · 08-03-2004, 06:05 PM

Seriously Bush's stupid meager "Cow Boy" tactics are just gonna get the US in a deeper hole than it is already in.

nogutsnoglory99 I deleted your posts. You can guess why. Do anymore of that you're banned.

/-\dam · 08-03-2004, 06:09 PM

hell who knows we still have troops in germany. i think we will be in iraq for a very long time. if we did invade another country id say it would be north korea. although personally id take out the french.

hiaseas · 08-03-2004, 06:20 PM

North Korea would be worse then Vietnam, I hope we dont invade anybody. But If Bush wins, my money is on Iran.

ingenexec · 08-03-2004, 06:58 PM

I can almost garuntee its gonna be Iran. Bush has already mentioned that they "might be harboring terrorists". Thats his latest excuse for invading someone.

Bush: "I really don't like those people, can we invade them?"
Random sane person: "I don't think so sir, there is no justifying that."
Bush: "Well... maybe they're harboring terrorists."
RSP: "Sir... It's Ohio. Its a state. You just can't invade a ****ing state."

DreadLock Doc · 08-03-2004, 07:06 PM

The Baldwin brothers.

slickguy55 · 08-03-2004, 07:08 PM

1)Iran
2)NK
3)Cuba

thats who i would go for.

DreadLock Doc · 08-03-2004, 07:12 PM

Cuba would be the ideal country to invade, seeing as how they haven't been terribly significant since 1962.

THEY'RE HARBORING TERRORISTS IN GUANTANAMO BAY!

Edit: So long as I'm in here, I might as well point out that invading Iran would be idiotic. Iran has a growing democratic movement thanks to its politically active youths. A war is not necessary to topple the theocratic government structure.

North Korea, meanwhile, probably has nuclear weapons by their own admission, and has vowed to use them only in defense against an invasion.

wudude · 08-03-2004, 10:30 PM

Hawaii.

DirtyDrake · 08-03-2004, 11:03 PM

Definatly Iran and we will be in Iraq for a very long time look at Japan, Korea and Germany.

we will or Isreal will bomb the weapons facilities developing nuclear weapons. Then we will arm and fund an internal pro-democratic movement to overthrow the current hostile government in Iran (the people are ready all they need is a little help from us)

llSmithll · 08-03-2004, 11:26 PM

why do people keep saying NK? they parade nukes in the streets there. it wouldnt be feasable because they actually do have wmds....

King TizUT · 08-04-2004, 12:27 AM

nothing is stopping anyone from invading the us.. itll happen just go out and buy a shotgun

Sacintimidator06 · 08-04-2004, 01:43 AM

We would make no money from going into NK, remember with Bush has president it is all about money. Ya of course there is no REAL reason to go into Iran. But was there ever really to go into Iraq? They will just say that they harbor terrorists, then the all the conservatives will all then become anti- Iranian . See the reason they would use to go into Iraq wouldnt matter about the current government, they would just invade then put in a US sponsored president.

BRETTISRAD · 08-04-2004, 02:40 AM

Norht Korea

or the chinese

DirtyDrake · 08-04-2004, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sacintimidator06
We would make no money from going into NK, remember with Bush has president it is all about money.

That is totally absurd, If I felt that Bush sacrificed 900 American lives for some quick cash I would have been the first calling for his head. "He did it for the money" is the same old typical democratic party line slander that has been used for decades to discredit republicans.

If you are going to bash Bush do a little research and point out policies that he really needs to be attacked on (medicare, boarder security, relationship with drug companies, stem cell research, Marriage amendment, etc) Don't just parrot what everyone else says, give it a little thought and look and see what issues are important to you and why you differ with the president (believe me there is plenty). Otherwise you come off looking like some uneducated left wing crack pot that is unable to reason logic (same goes with right wing crack pots).