Vote for the HB Field Layout

**John** · 02-25-2009, 03:14 PM

I personally think Fields 1 and 3 have the most traditional layouts but I admit I want to play/watch Field 2 the most. It would be cool to see who can adapt to a layout like that.

EOSRyanEOS · 02-25-2009, 03:26 PM

1 or 3 i dont care which just not 2, the 50 is to clustered looks like a noob feild

PICKLES!!! · 02-25-2009, 03:48 PM

It looks like helen keller made these

Pbrockstarz · 02-25-2009, 03:49 PM

3 is ok

Booya39 · 02-25-2009, 04:34 PM

Field 3 looks the easiest to ref.

**GP** · 02-25-2009, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John

I personally think Fields 1 and 3 have the most traditional layouts but I admit I want to play/watch Field 2 the most. It would be cool to see who can adapt to a layout like that.

Field 2 reminds me of some old hyperball layouts. It would be fun but I am not sure how the USPL would ref it.

f-unit · 02-25-2009, 04:55 PM

i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl

scadreau · 02-25-2009, 05:01 PM

3D image of field 1 is up. I will be adding 2 & 3 later tonight.

Tom222 · 02-25-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by f-unit

i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl

I agree 100%.

wyckofflax16 · 02-25-2009, 05:17 PM

3 and 1 are wayy to basic..

Vote 2..

scadreau · 02-25-2009, 05:39 PM

The Dorito side on field 2 is jacked. I will do my 3D so it is even on both sides. The dorito side cans on field 3 are not the same either.

Etownbeatdown · 02-25-2009, 05:46 PM

where dou post your 3d layout scadreau>?

|^^|oN|<eY|3oY · 02-25-2009, 05:47 PM

Please go with 1 or 3, preferably 3. I don't want to be playing another XPSL with the crazy dumb layouts haha. I like traditional layouts and ones with snakes because that's what I play

wavedanger · 02-25-2009, 05:49 PM

3 ftw

Rojk · 02-25-2009, 05:56 PM

I may be conservatistic, but number three is the only sensible.

paintballguru92 · 02-25-2009, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TcIronkids

Vote 3!

QFT!!!!

1 is to psp mao'is

2 is just...

3 is ftw

paintballguru92 · 02-25-2009, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by f-unit

i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl

WHY do we want it to be different then nppl???

when it comes down to just paintball nppl was great, so why change it? to me this is supposed to be like NPPL 09

usafpilot07 · 02-25-2009, 06:37 PM

Field 3 ftw.

Field 2 kinda reminds me of the diamond layout at Tampa a couple years ago.

Kaolinite · 02-25-2009, 06:54 PM

feild 2 is amazing!

that is in your face paintball right there, it would be intresting to see how teams would play feild 2, it would be the most insaine paintball i have ever watched in my life, if the uspl really wants to try to take 7man in a new more aggressive direction feilds like that will do it

P4IN7 B4LLS · 02-25-2009, 07:12 PM

maybe for future events they should make all 3 so weird and crazy that there is no "conservative" field and everyone is forced to pick a crazy layout

Davvid · 02-25-2009, 07:35 PM

Number 3 is a good field to play or reff. we've all tried those crazy fields and didn't like them. the only thing about 3 it needs something more at the 35 or40 so you don't have to many stalemates. 2 forsure no. 1 has potential and I wouldn't mind playing that just for the change. Probably less stalemates on 1.