[SHOOT3R USA]

The Packers are a bad team and they deserved to lose to superior competition.

I don't know how you can say their defense played better than the Sea Hawks... At least the Sea Hawks recorded an interception. Albeit if 87% of the country is to God damn stupid to see that he clearly had a firm grasp on the ball.

ITT: some butt hurt Packers nut rider is butt hurt that Green Bay sucks this season and probably won't make the play offs.

[imhungry (Banned)]

Originally Posted by Paintnoob13

***** please, like you have a choice in the matter

[Lou Dogg]

Commissioner, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but right now the shield is tarnishing faster than a sailor's virtue in a two-dollar whorehouse-Kluwe

[Antonio Gates]

Looked like an interception to me. And after hanging around Philip a few years, I feel like I'm an expert in that regard.

[JJags32MJD]

Thank you twitter. :')

[imhungry (Banned)]

tbh the booth officials (who are not part of the strike IIRC) are more to blame than the replacement refs. they reviewed the call on the field so they really should be more to blame.

i am not entirely sure if they are part of the lock out or not so it could be one in the same, i suppose

[sirX]

They said last night the "booth review crew" were the normal reviewers, and were not part of the lock out.

[imhungry (Banned)]

ok so wouldnt it make sense to place more of the blame on them, who happen to be the NORMAL dudes? calls can be hard to see on the field, especially in something like that. they had the tape and they missed it


looks like they might have more problems than just replacement refs...

[Paintnoob13]

The commentators were saying that you can't review that call I guess.

Or maybe it could, I have no idea but I just found this article http://www.businessinsider.com/could...eviewed-2012-9

[imhungry (Banned)]

all scoring plays are reviewed. i dont understand how that is any difference and apparently it isnt

[Lou Dogg]

[AdReNaLiN jUnKeE]

Its because it was called a mutual catch and you cant review who actually had posession

[sirX]

Nope, because they didn't have "indisputable" evidence to overturn the play anyway.



I know that



I would bet that 95% of the normal refs would have made the same call.

[Paintnoob13]

Originally Posted by imhungry

all scoring plays are reviewed. i dont understand how that is any difference and apparently it isnt

Some people are saying you can't review simultaneous possession in the endzone

[imhungry (Banned)]

Originally Posted by Paintnoob13

Some people are saying you can't review simultaneous possession in the endzone

that still does not make sense because a simultaneous possession ends up favoring the receiving team and it would be a score. I DEMAND WE HAVE A REF COME IN TO CLARIFY!

[AdReNaLiN jUnKeE]

Except the second part of that rule says if one person clearly has original posession and then another gains mutual posession it goes to whoever had original posession which would be jennings.

Shut up trolls

[imhungry (Banned)]

yea that would make sense but it was ruled a TOUCHDOWN on the field so it should have been reviewed regardless.

[JC Nor7]

Tate had two hands on the ball and both feet on the ground. Jennings was still air born.

[Paintnoob13]

Aren't you the guy that plays female characters in video games? I don't think we can trust the testimony of a pedophile neckbeard.

[imhungry (Banned)]

the golden taint shall not be denied

Originally Posted by Paintnoob13

Aren't you the guy that plays female characters in video games? I don't think we can trust the testimony of a pedophile neckbeard.

i only play chicks in video games

[Ninja Mouse]

Seattle fans are so dumb. I'd rather be winless than a retard.