 |
|
01-14-2013, 02:09 PM
|
#22
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
|
I thought E=mv^2 only works with quantum calculations.
|
|
|
01-14-2013, 02:27 PM
|
#23
|
|
BSH University
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MD
|
The more I think about this the more wrong it becomes actually, lots of laws and formulas for how a compressed gas behaves that I forgot about a while ago. And my brain hurts trying to remember them.
|
|
|
01-14-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#24
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyronejk
a marker with a bolt of zero grams, zero friction, zero internal volume (including regulators, hoses, and chambers)
|
Where can I buy this?
|
|
|
01-14-2013, 05:04 PM
|
#25
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmpireEmperor
Where can I buy this?
|
Brass Eagle 
|
|
|
01-14-2013, 05:07 PM
|
#26
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paper_Cut
Brass Eagle 
|
I think I found it
I can't wait to mow fools with this bad boy.
|
|
|
01-22-2013, 09:16 AM
|
#27
|
|
RIP: Underĝath
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedy2k4
The more I think about this the more wrong it becomes actually, lots of laws and formulas for how a compressed gas behaves that I forgot about a while ago. And my brain hurts trying to remember them.
|
There are a ton of assumptions being made.
__________________
Have a NDZ or Tech T axe bolt you'd like to trade for Boss bolt or sell? PM me!
Donations for an ultimate bolt test would be nice too.
|
|
|
02-06-2013, 11:18 AM
|
#28
|
|
|
__________________
IF THE FIRST THING YOU WOULD GRAB IN A FIRE IS YOUR PAINTBALL STUFF, PUT THIS IN YOUR SIG
Studies show that 91% of paintball players would die if HK said breathing wasn't "AGG" Put this in your Signature if your one of the 9% who would celebrate the mass suicide of Hostile Kids
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#29
|
|
|
Not bad.
But you've completely forgot about Entropy and Adiabatic Process.
|
|
|
05-09-2013, 11:00 PM
|
#30
|
|
just Luxback
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mni Sota
|
this is cool ive always wondered what the max efficiency would be if the bolt was stationary with a nearly perfect reg and zero porting in the barrel i figured it would be higher though like 3K owell ha
bob longs coming pretty close with 17 pods off of a 68 in the insight NG so 17*140= 2380 dam hes getting close to no friction anywhere ha
dont mean to troll at all
|
|
|
05-10-2013, 08:39 AM
|
#31
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Atlanta
|
You are negating far too many variables.
|
|
|
06-07-2013, 09:31 PM
|
#32
|
|
Gun For Hire
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kalamazoo mi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyronejk
As of August 29, 2012, I cannot think of a single marker that has a mass-less bolt. Or a volume-less regulator. Or zero friction.
Also, it's a little difficult to measure the efficiency of compressed air. Calling this the maximum efficiency of a tank, rather than a marker, is similar to saying that the Prius doesn't get 55 mpg, the tank gets 55 mpg. I wish the tank on my Jaguar was as efficient as a tank on a Prius.
|
did your instructor not stress that mpg is not effeciency
ex and engine can be 85% efficent in converting potental energy into usuable energy but there is alway loss due to heat. 85% of the potental was transfered into usuable energy and 15% was lost due to heat, but mpg is not effeciency.
|
|
|
06-07-2013, 09:32 PM
|
#33
|
|
Gun For Hire
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kalamazoo mi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanR
this is cool ive always wondered what the max efficiency would be if the bolt was stationary with a nearly perfect reg and zero porting in the barrel i figured it would be higher though like 3K owell ha
bob longs coming pretty close with 17 pods off of a 68 in the insight NG so 17*140= 2380 dam hes getting close to no friction anywhere ha
dont mean to troll at all
|
keep in mind that not every shot is on 300 fps on these test
|
|
|
06-07-2013, 11:49 PM
|
#34
|
|
That purple stuff
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FyReFiTe051
|
LOL
tyrone -- i like the scientific approach to this thread, interesting to read! i doubt anyone above could do a writeup of this caliber! pun intended!
Last edited by kool_aid22 : 06-08-2013 at 12:00 AM.
|
|
|
06-08-2013, 07:27 AM
|
#35
|
|
BSH University
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MD
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woah
ex and engine can be 85% efficent in converting potental energy into usuable energy but there is alway loss due to heat. 85% of the potental was transfered into usuable energy and 15% was lost due to heat, but mpg is not effeciency.
|
Internal combustion engines convert maybe 40% of chemical potential energy into kinetic energy to move the car. Roughly 30% is lost as heat dispersed in the exhaust and 30% as heat dispersed through the engine block and coolant. Very inefficient.
When you apply the brakes to slow down, that 40% kinetic energy also becomes heat through friction. One car may get better MPG but not be technically more efficient in converting energy, it simply uses less fuel because it produces and requires less power. However with a Hybrid car like the Prius, some of that energy normally expended as heat while slowing down is instead used to spin a generator, which converts it to electrical energy stored for later use. So while it is not directly linked to MPG, the Prius is more efficient than the Jag.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|