[Worr, the wee tot. (Banned)]

I do, in excessively copious amounts.

[pyromaniacs1]

Federal drinking age would be 18.

[ProtoBaller1991]

Originally Posted by pyromaniacs1

Federal drinking age would be 18.

idk if that'd be a good idea. BUT I do think it's dumb that people can serve in the military at 18 and can't drink. So I think if you're 18 and in the military you should be allowed to drink.

[undiscoveredtalent]

Originally Posted by pbmink

I don't even inhale flowers anymore

East Coast. If I could get my hands on enough oil I would switch except for the morning splif.

Don't have the luxury of good oil and I hate using my tiny tube.

Originally Posted by Worr, the wee tot.

I do, in excessively copious amounts.

.

[Soviet Tacos]

Originally Posted by ProtoBaller1991

idk if that'd be a good idea. BUT I do think it's dumb that people can serve in the military at 18 and can't drink. So I think if you're 18 and in the military you should be allowed to drink.

i do then i could buy your sister drinks and **** the **** out of her.

[TheImPgoD]

Originally Posted by chodeyg

This isn't a debate. I don't care if you don't want to educate yourself.

The thing is, you can't ignore the studies that say otherwise either. And that's exactly what you're doing. Why should I google these Harvard studies (Told to me as if it mattered that Harvard did the study) if you're just going to cite the same study over and over? I've read more of them than you've heard of. And while weed doesn't have the same high level of risk that tobacco has (In cigarettes especially), it IS hazardous to your health. If you think not causing cancer doesn't mean hazardous, then I'm just talking to a wall.

Maybe you should "educate" yourself about being stubborn.

Meanie.

[smahthers2K12 (Banned)]

I would make it legal to be naked in mcdonalds. Thats all iv ever wanted, to eat a big mac in the comfort of my own skin.

[fromsnake]

Originally Posted by smahthers2K12

I would make it legal to be naked in mcdonalds. Thats all iv ever wanted, to eat a big mac in the comfort of my own skin.

I don't think that's such a good idea..... If so there would have to be a weight limit.

[TheImPgoD]

Originally Posted by smahthers2K12

I would make it legal to be naked in mcdonalds. Thats all iv ever wanted, to eat a big mac in the comfort of my own skin.

So you take your skin off when you eat McDonalds too? I thought I was the only one.. we have SO much in common.

How about dinner tomorrow? My parents would be there. That's okay with you right?

[smahthers2K12 (Banned)]

Just because you said churros we're gonna be gr8 frens.

[TheImPgoD]

You saw that?

Crap. In my old age I've forgotten how to do a proper ninja edit. Also, quit refreshing so much

You before: F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F55F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5

You in future: F5... *pause*..... F5

plz.

[pbmink]

Originally Posted by undiscoveredtalent

East Coast. If I could get my hands on enough oil I would switch except for the morning monkey.

Don't have the luxury of good oil and I hate using my tiny duck
.

I love my monkeys still.
I just bought a tiny duck. It's pretty.

[chodeyg]

Originally Posted by TheImPgoD

The thing is, you can't ignore the studies that say otherwise either. And that's exactly what you're doing. Why should I google these Harvard studies (Told to me as if it mattered that Harvard did the study) if you're just going to cite the same study over and over? I've read more of them than you've heard of. And while weed doesn't have the same high level of risk that tobacco has (In cigarettes especially), it IS hazardous to your health. If you think not causing cancer doesn't mean hazardous, then I'm just talking to a wall.

Maybe you should "educate" yourself about being stubborn.

Meanie.

No you goofball I just said it doesn't cause cancer. I don't think its good for you. I think the fact that Harvard did it matters a little, its better than jail community college or whatever. But mostly they were important cause they were the largest of their kind.

[Watermelondrea]

Originally Posted by ProtoBaller1991

.

lol @ stoners who think inhaling smoke doesn't have a negative effect. Not saying it'll cause cancer... but it sure isn't helping your lungs.

if you work out everyday you should be fine. it might still have negative effects, but the ****, so does walking past someone smoking a cigarette

[MSmags011]

Drinking age=16
and no such thing as public nudity except for fat chicks

[<3applesAndoranges<3]

itt thread white suburban teenagers struggle with the concept of "one"

[fromsnake]

Originally Posted by <3applesAndoranges&lt

itt thread white suburban teenagers struggle with the concept of "one"

Says the suburban teenager who has hello kitty as his Avvy and <3Applesandoranges<3 as his user name.....

[Vswizzle (Banned)]

Originally Posted by dualimpact

This thread is now about bill hicks

Why is marijuana against the law? It grows naturally upon our planet. Doesn’t the idea of making nature against the law seem to you a bit… unnatural?

If I were gonna legalize a drug it would not be alcohol you know why? There’s better drugs and better drugs for you. That’s a fact so you can stop your internal dialogue… Wait a minute, Bill alcohol is an acceptable form of social interaction that for thousands of years has enabled…. shut the **** up, your denial is beneath you and thanks to the use of hallucinogenic drugs I see through you.

Not only do I think Marijuana should be legalized… I think it should be mandatory.

Pot is a better drug than alcohol, FACT! I’ll prove it to you, you’re at a ballgame or a concert and someone’s really violent, aggressive and obnoxious are they drunk or are they smoking pot? Drunk would be the one and only correct answer. I have never seen people on pot get in a fight because its ****ing impossible.

It grows naturally on our planet, serves a thousand different functions, all of them positive. To make marijuana against the law is like saying that God made a mistake.

And if you don’t believe drugs have done good things for us, do me a favor. Go home tonight. Take all your albums, all your tapes and all your CDs and burn them. ‘Cause you know what, the musicians that made all that great music that’s enhanced your lives throughout the years, rrreal ****ing high on drugs. The Beatles were so ****ing high they let Ringo sing a few tunes.

They lie about marijuana. Tell you pot-smoking makes you unmotivated. Lie! When you’re high, you can do everything you normally do just as well – you just realize that it’s not worth the ****ing effort.

legalize heroin and methamphetamine
:nododgy:
why?
because they feel really good

[alexjordan1]

Originally Posted by Christian P

Just like the title says, what law would you change and why?

I'd allow kids 13 and older to get punched for saying something stupid.

i agree we should be able to beat up those little punks!

[DB-1071]

Everyone in America require to own least one hand gun, that be nice.

[chodeyg]

Originally Posted by DB-1071

Everyone in America require to own least one hand gun, that be nice.

Why not firearm instead of hangun? I'm more of a rifle guy