|
View Poll Results: Which Field Layout Do You Want to See Used in HB?
|
|
Field 1
|
  
|
275 |
29.60% |
|
Field 2
|
  
|
220 |
23.68% |
|
Field 3
|
  
|
434 |
46.72% |
 |
|
02-25-2009, 03:14 PM
|
#22
|
|
Straight shooter with upper management written all over him.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: STL
|
I personally think Fields 1 and 3 have the most traditional layouts but I admit I want to play/watch Field 2 the most. It would be cool to see who can adapt to a layout like that.
__________________
Your questions are answered in the PbNation FAQ. Ask a Mod.
We deserve better villains.
"I have not seen an automag shot in anger in 10 years." Tom Cole
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 03:26 PM
|
#23
|
|
|
1 or 3 i dont care which just not 2, the 50 is to clustered looks like a noob feild
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 03:48 PM
|
#24
|
|
|
It looks like helen keller made these
__________________
Paintballgateway.com
Nuskool Wrecking Crew
Kamikaze Kids
NoLimitSoldiers
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 03:49 PM
|
#25
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: paintball field
|
fields
3 is ok
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 04:34 PM
|
#26
|
|
STORK
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego
|
Field 3 looks the easiest to ref. 
__________________
Jr
Sunday Red
If you think school is hard, try being stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 04:35 PM
|
#27
|
|
ac402.com
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DALLAS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John
I personally think Fields 1 and 3 have the most traditional layouts but I admit I want to play/watch Field 2 the most. It would be cool to see who can adapt to a layout like that.
|
Field 2 reminds me of some old hyperball layouts. It would be fun but I am not sure how the USPL would ref it.
__________________
ac402.com/ac: DALLAS/ ac:DFW
Join the Imperial Program G.I. Sportz! PM me for details
ECLIPSE
EXALT
V-Force
2013 X-FACTOR!! Yup the PAIN TRAIN is back on track!
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 04:55 PM
|
#28
|
|
chris wipes face hits
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MI
|
i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl
__________________
TCP MACHINE-D1 NPPL
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:01 PM
|
#29
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
|
3D image of field 1 is up. I will be adding 2 & 3 later tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:03 PM
|
#30
|
|
Mutiny and Vigilante
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by f-unit
i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl
|
I agree 100%. |
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:17 PM
|
#31
|
|
Ranjerz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: north jersey
|
3 and 1 are wayy to basic..
Vote 2..
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:39 PM
|
#32
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
|
The Dorito side on field 2 is jacked. I will do my 3D so it is even on both sides. The dorito side cans on field 3 are not the same either.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:46 PM
|
#33
|
|
|
where dou post your 3d layout scadreau>?
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:47 PM
|
#34
|
|
Stewie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vegas
|
Please go with 1 or 3, preferably 3. I don't want to be playing another XPSL with the crazy dumb layouts haha. I like traditional layouts and ones with snakes because that's what I play 
__________________
| L.V. Effects| |Rest in Peace Baby J #5|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:49 PM
|
#35
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: *NY*
|
3 ftw
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#36
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
|
I may be conservatistic, but number three is the only sensible.
__________________
It's easier to be an a**hole to words than to people
PBnyheter: Paintball news in swedish.
Follow us on Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 06:22 PM
|
#37
|
|
Take no days off.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TcIronkids
Vote 3!
|
QFT!!!!
1 is to psp mao'is
2 is just...
3 is ftw
__________________
Christ Krew-108
COLORADO VILLAIN #10 - CHESTER COPPERPOT
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 06:25 PM
|
#38
|
|
Take no days off.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by f-unit
i think field 3 is generic and a traditional nppl field. if the uspl wants to make hb a statement they should go with either field 1 or 2. using field 3 will make it basically no different then nppl
|
WHY do we want it to be different then nppl???
when it comes down to just paintball nppl was great, so why change it? to me this is supposed to be like NPPL 09
__________________
Christ Krew-108
COLORADO VILLAIN #10 - CHESTER COPPERPOT
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 06:37 PM
|
#39
|
|
East Coast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC *919*
|
Field 3 ftw.
Field 2 kinda reminds me of the diamond layout at Tampa a couple years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 06:54 PM
|
#40
|
|
+-----------+
|
feild 2 is amazing!
that is in your face paintball right there, it would be intresting to see how teams would play feild 2, it would be the most insaine paintball i have ever watched in my life, if the uspl really wants to try to take 7man in a new more aggressive direction feilds like that will do it
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 07:12 PM
|
#41
|
|
FARSIDE KIDS // HELLCATS
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoMich
|
maybe for future events they should make all 3 so weird and crazy that there is no "conservative" field and everyone is forced to pick a crazy layout
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 07:35 PM
|
#42
|
|
Capital Edge Hitters
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Folsom, Ca. 916
|
Number 3 is a good field to play or reff. we've all tried those crazy fields and didn't like them. the only thing about 3 it needs something more at the 35 or40 so you don't have to many stalemates. 2 forsure no. 1 has potential and I wouldn't mind playing that just for the change. Probably less stalemates on 1.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
