| Message |
|
You are currently not logged in, so you are not able to vote or submit your own reviews!
|
| Dye Precision - 04 Hybrid Pants |
| Manufacturer Information |
Edit |
Product Description |
Edit |
Dye Precision
10637 Scripps Summit Court
San Diego, CA 92131
Phone: +1-858-536-5183
Fax: +1-858-536-5191
Email: service@dyeprecison.com
Website: http://www.dyeprecision.com
|
The 2004 Hybrid Pant is a seamless combination of light weight and durability. Designed with the same specifics in mind, this pant boasts many of the same features as its big brother, the C4 Pant, only lightened. |
| Release Date: |
2004 |
| MSRP: |
$73.00 |
| Average Rating: |
|
| Reviews: |
4 |
| Rating Summary: |
|
| Link: |
| Reviews |
03-01-2008, 04:25 PM |
Report this review to a moderator
#2214
|
|
cerealkiller_
eat a bleepin dorito
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: *386 FL
|
Length of use: |
More than 1 year |
| Overall Rating: |
|
| Appearance: |
|
| Performance: |
|
| Reliability: |
|
| Value: |
|
| Price paid: |
$29.99 |
| Pros: |
Great Looks, Adjustable waist |
| Cons: |
No padding |
Overall these were awesome pants!
The adjustable waist and ankles served me well and they looked awesome too. The flexable fabric in the crotch prevented blowouts like in some pants today. The only thing I would recommend is getting knee pads as there is a lack of padding in these.
|
| |
This review has been rated: |
|
|
11-15-2008, 12:11 PM |
Report this review to a moderator
#4869
|
|
DaEagleEye8
Uconn Husky
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Storrs, CT
|
Length of use: |
More than 1 year |
| Overall Rating: |
|
| Appearance: |
|
| Performance: |
|
| Reliability: |
|
| Value: |
|
| Price paid: |
$40.00 |
| Pros: |
Quality, comfort, weight |
| Cons: |
Lack of padding |
|
These pants have been the most durable pair of pants I've EVER owned. They are adjustable in the waist and ankles, have a stretchy material at the crotch (so they don't rip) and are the lightest pants I've ever worn. I've owned these pants for about 3 years now, and when I first bought them, I figured it wouldn't last too long but would make some good practice pants. Boy was I wrong...till this day I wear my hybrids and LOVE them. It has been three years, and I am yet to rip them anywhere (the only thing that shows is some knee wear, but not a single rip there either). The only thing these don't have is knee padding, but as long as you wear knee pads like 99% of players do, these are great! Would def. recommend these to any player that can get their hands on them. Heck, if I could find a new pair of these, I would buy them myself!
|
| |
This review has been rated: |
|
|
02-27-2008, 11:07 AM |
Report this review to a moderator
#1691
|
|
kingbacuraflip22
Fking ANIMAL
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manhattan~ New York City
|
Length of use: |
Less than 6 months |
| Overall Rating: |
|
| Appearance: |
|
| Performance: |
|
| Reliability: |
|
| Value: |
|
| Price paid: |
$70.00 |
| Pros: |
Looks, Comfort, Quality, Adjustability |
| Cons: |
Lack of good padding. |
I bought these back in 2005.
The price was really good especially since they're Dye.
Pros:
Looks- Looked good, especially back in the day.
Comfort- Very comfortable when running and such.
Adjustability- Very adjustable at the waist
Quality- Good quality, never ripped
Cons:
-Not really any padding for the legs. Thats why I gave it 3 stars for performance.
|
| |
This review has been rated: |
|
|
04-10-2008, 03:51 AM |
Report this review to a moderator
#3127
|
|
seantwopointone
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ruston/Shreveport LA
|
Length of use: |
Less than 6 months |
| Overall Rating: |
|
| Appearance: |
|
| Performance: |
|
| Reliability: |
|
| Value: |
|
| Price paid: |
$20.00 |
| Pros: |
quality |
| Cons: |
padding |
These pants are four years old. Not a single rip, small holes on knees from normally wear and tear but no spreading what so ever. Someone people might gripe that there isn't any padding (but you should be wearing pads) but it makes for a super light and breathable pants.
Did I mention that mine are four years old and still kick ***?
|
| |
This review has been rated: |
|
|
|
